Research portal

Ambiguity aversion is not universal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Assuming universal ambiguity aversion, an extensive theoretical literature studies how ambiguity can account for market anomalies from the perspective of expected utility-based theories. We provide a systematic experimental assessment of ambiguity attitudes in different likelihood ranges, and in the gain domain, the loss domain and with mixed outcomes. We draw on a unified framework to elicit preferences across these domains. We replicate the usual finding of ambiguity aversion for moderate likelihood gains. However, when introducing losses or lower likelihoods, we observe predominantly ambiguity neutrality or seeking, rejecting universal ambiguity aversion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268–283
JournalEuropean Economic Review
StatePublished - Jan 2018

    Research areas

  • ambiguity aversion, decision under uncertainty, Ellsberg experiments
Login to Pure (for TiU staff only)